Eli ([personal profile] eub) wrote2011-08-28 02:16 am

another thing, or think

I ran across a Metafilter thread about the expression "if you think that, you've got another (think/thing) coming." If this is a familiar stock expression to you, which version is familiar, "thing" or "think"? Have you heard the other version?
(Warning: the thread is a mashup of this think/thing with an "is 0.999repeating = 1" debate; skim over unless that's something you enjoy.)

My dad and I agreed that it's a familiar expression, and we'd never heard anyone using the wrong word in it, that would sound bizarre, why is there even a thread about this. But it turned out we disagreed on which word is the right one. The usage in the wild is definitely mixed (it skews "thing" in Google web search, "think" in n-gram books search), and he and I apparently each inferred one correct usage, and assimilated the other one to it, without even noticing the mixedness. Yay language.

(Historically, the "think" version appears to have come first as a stock phrase, carrying a "comically unusual grammar" flavor. The "thing" probably came from rationalizing it, and a small phonetic step given that the doubled /k/ sound in "think coming" is commonly reduced. (The OED2 has an earlier cite for "thing", but since its publication they have pushed "think" earlier.))

[identity profile] caladri.livejournal.com 2011-08-28 10:11 am (UTC)(link)
Let's debate the relative merits of different putative English plurals of "octopus"!

I only recall hearing "thing", but suspect that after saying this I will encounter dozens of cases in which "think" is used in things (thinks? — I don't know which is which anymore!) that I've read a bajillion times without noticing.

[identity profile] randomdreams.livejournal.com 2011-08-28 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)
'think', definitely. It's not clear to me what 'thing' would mean.

[identity profile] jinian.livejournal.com 2011-08-28 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
"Think"! The other one drives me up the wall!

Rationalizing how? Because "think" isn't normally a noun?

(I need another sentence pair. It's so I can use preiods to terminate both.)

[identity profile] beaq.livejournal.com 2011-08-28 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
"Think", and "thing" bothers me because it doesn't make any sense.

[identity profile] marzipan-pig.livejournal.com 2011-08-28 06:32 pm (UTC)(link)
My dad and I agreed that it's a familiar expression, and we'd never heard anyone using the wrong word in it, that would sound bizarre, why is there even a thread about this. But it turned out we disagreed on which word is the right one.

Ha ha ha ha ha!

Just think/g, soon enough you'll get to have this debate with your OWN children :)
cellio: (avatar-face)

[personal profile] cellio 2011-08-28 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Thing? Who knew? It's always been think to me.

[identity profile] rehana.livejournal.com 2011-08-29 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
Think is more familiar, and I've heard both, and they both bothered me because they didn't make sense.

[personal profile] hattifattener 2011-08-29 07:38 am (UTC)(link)
I've always heard (well, seen) "think", have only seen "thing" in casual internet usage and I consider "thing" to be wrongity wrong and nonsensical. The One True Idiom ("think") makes perfect sense— using "think" as a noun here is the kind of minor wordplay that, istm, is common in this kind of phrase— but the False Heretical Corruption ("thing") makes no sense. Why would you say "another thing" without a previous thing as a referent? Why would an 8-foot-tall Wookiee live on a planet of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? This does not make sense! You must acquit.
blk: (Default)

[personal profile] blk 2011-08-29 01:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Think. I don't know that I've ever heard the other, or if I have, I likely dismissed it automatically as being someone's ignorant confusion.