Does it look like the camera did something funny with the chain-link pattern? Like it can handle the near and far patterns when they align, but twice that frequency, when they're out of phase, gets lost and turned to mush.
Actually, it looks the way a chain link fenec looks when you let my eyes go out of focus a little. Which is a really cool effect to get in a photograph.
I have to admit I flipped that one upside-down. It's such a neat pattern, like a stained-glass window.
The creek is nice to walk along, chattery. I want to do the length of it, and I didn't do the south side at all. (At the mossy stone bridge, you see it is getting dark.)
ha, a favourite? i can never do that. i love that you caught that bit of gossamer spider string; i rarely meet a blossom closeup i don't like; the fern babies are cool just because they are fern babies; and i really like the trees silhouetted against the expanding clouds in the big sky (me, i'd photoshop the wires outta there, i cheat like that).
One bush along the north bluff trail, when you lined up the sun behind it, had dozens of gossamer threads streaming up off it in the breeze. None of the pictures worked; I guess because it's the motion that catches the eye.
I cheat, but I'm a lazy cheater. And I don't mind those wires -- they support the left side.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 12:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 07:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 07:27 pm (UTC)Does it look like the camera did something funny with the chain-link pattern? Like it can handle the near and far patterns when they align, but twice that frequency, when they're out of phase, gets lost and turned to mush.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 12:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 08:53 am (UTC)personally, i love the one with the natural frame of the arched tree.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 06:47 pm (UTC)The creek is nice to walk along, chattery. I want to do the length of it, and I didn't do the south side at all. (At the mossy stone bridge, you see it is getting dark.)
Re: Carkeek Park today
Date: 2004-03-09 06:46 pm (UTC)Re: Carkeek Park today
Date: 2004-03-09 07:23 pm (UTC)I cheat, but I'm a lazy cheater. And I don't mind those wires -- they support the left side.