Profile
Eli
Page Summary
dr4b - (no subject)
marzipan-pig.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eub.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jinian.livejournal.com - literal answer
chaoticgoodnik.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eub.livejournal.com - Re: literal answer
fuzzycoffeebean.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eub.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eub.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 03:28 am (UTC)And rainbows have nothing to hide.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 05:35 am (UTC)literal answer
Date: 2005-08-02 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 03:17 pm (UTC)Re: literal answer
Date: 2005-08-02 07:33 pm (UTC)Interestingly, some people think that wings came from ancestral gills at some point along the line.
I can't think of any insects that I know stay underwater, without coming up for air. Oh, hellgrammites I think. Other larvae? Not mosquito.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:48 am (UTC)http://entomology.unl.edu/lgh/marine_insects/marinehome.html
So, no, it's not entirely understood why after millions of years of adaptive radiation there are only a handful of oceanic insect species. And even still these species live on the water/air interface.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 04:31 am (UTC)Interesting counterexamples to some of the hypotheses. The bloodworms of abyssal Baikal are way cool.
Hm, competitive exclusion is all very well when talking about a single niche and two species, but here we have a whole array of oceanic niches, and a whole array of terrestial ones, and two subphylum(?)-level groupings of species. Competitive exclusion as I understand it would have nothing to say against oceanic niches being parceled out some to crustaceans, some to insects -- freshwater niches are parceled out something like that. I can see as how exclusion might generalize to the larger scales too, but... yeah, "not entirely understood" sounds fitting.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 04:32 am (UTC)