Date: 2005-08-05 11:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fuzzycoffeebean.livejournal.com
There is much debate over this question. Here is a website that provides simplified summaries (it's a resource for teachers) of the hypotheses for the marine insect question:

http://entomology.unl.edu/lgh/marine_insects/marinehome.html

So, no, it's not entirely understood why after millions of years of adaptive radiation there are only a handful of oceanic insect species. And even still these species live on the water/air interface.

Date: 2005-08-06 04:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eub.livejournal.com
Hi, thanks for dropping in.

Interesting counterexamples to some of the hypotheses. The bloodworms of abyssal Baikal are way cool.

Hm, competitive exclusion is all very well when talking about a single niche and two species, but here we have a whole array of oceanic niches, and a whole array of terrestial ones, and two subphylum(?)-level groupings of species. Competitive exclusion as I understand it would have nothing to say against oceanic niches being parceled out some to crustaceans, some to insects -- freshwater niches are parceled out something like that. I can see as how exclusion might generalize to the larger scales too, but... yeah, "not entirely understood" sounds fitting.

Profile

Eli

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23 45 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 10:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios