Eli ([personal profile] eub) wrote2010-08-26 10:23 pm

apparently all those textbook writers never actually ate a viceroy butterfly

And the fact that they taste fine has been false for more than half the time I've known it.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v350/n6318/abs/350497a0.html
Nature 350, 497 - 498 (11 April 1991); doi:10.1038/350497a0
The viceroy butterfly is not a batesian mimic
...
Our experiment refutes this interpretation by revealing that viceroys are as unpalatable as monarchs, and significantly more unpalatable than queens from representative Florida populations.

[identity profile] randomdreams.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
I recently read a book about mimicry and various types of camouflage and that was their claim, as well: that both butterflies benefitted by being nasty-tasting and adopting a similar marking strategy. They had a lot of other, similar examples as well.

[identity profile] eub.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 06:16 am (UTC)(link)
Yep, and it's interesting that they don't get (too much) cheating, even though presumably there's no way for them to police.
blk: (smirk)

[personal profile] blk 2010-08-27 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)
And the fact that they taste fine has been false for more than half the time I've known it.

I hope you didn't test this yourself by trying to taste it.

[identity profile] eub.livejournal.com 2010-08-28 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
Then I would have discovered their M\"ullerian mimicry! It would have been teh awseome.