short bits

Feb. 20th, 2010 04:55 pm
[personal profile] eub
You know how you hear people delicately aghast that the target of their gossip would use sprouted garlic? I always used sprouted garlic, but I think I'm concluding it really does taste worse.

Phenology:
Snowdrops are wrapping up.
Walking-stick kale is starting to flower, about a year old.
Roses are belatedly pruned.
Plum is flowering.
Cydonia floret.

Oh by the way, you can stick a toothpick through a garlic clove and sprout on a jar it like a sweet potato, totally. Tons of roots; I wonder if those are tasty like garlicky mung sprouts?

I didn't think I cared what my weight was, but from my reaction to being surprised at a change in the number, I was overestimating my not-caring.

Are there predatory insects that it would be a workable idea to release in the house?

Linked to from this blog post, a web database of biological numbers and a related paper I haven't read yet. Want to know the ATP/ADP ratio in light versus darkness in various compartments of a spinach cell?

Date: 2010-02-21 04:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mh75.livejournal.com
changed for the better? That's wonderful - good work and congratulations.

Date: 2010-02-21 05:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eub.livejournal.com
Well, but I don't, intellectually, believe that number X is any better than number Y. And I happen to have the non-fat privilege it takes to think I *really* believe that, but it turns out I don't. Since I didn't do any work I don't think I warrant congratulations. :)

Date: 2010-02-21 05:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mh75.livejournal.com
Well, sometimes getting worse makes you realize that you were actually paying too much attention to where you were.

I would like to think that the actual number doesn't matter at all (although, i'm vain enough that it does to me), but i firmly, and unapologetically, believe that how you feel and how healthy you are at your particular number does matter. I believe that any changes you have made are based on identifying something that was causing you to be unhealthy, and modifying it, so the number may also be a concrete way to measure improvement in something far more important - your health.

I think you have done work - it may be gentle work, but it is work. And i think you should give yourself credit for sticking to the changes.

Date: 2010-02-21 05:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eub.livejournal.com
Thanks, Meg. Yep, I have paid some attention to eating less saturated fat, and I think that's probably worthwhile for me. I'll see what my blood lipids think of that, sometime soon... even those numbers are fairly loosely tied to health AFAICT, but those are the ones I'm aiming to track.

Date: 2010-02-21 06:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marzipan-pig.livejournal.com
My lipid profile went from DANGEROUS to perfectly fine over a few years with absolutely no intervention on my part, it was pretty weird. I had gained 50 lbs in 6 months (as a side effect from a drug I take for other non-optional reasons) right before the DANGEROUS, and that leveled off fine, but I hadn't really changed anything (food, exercise) and I hadn't lost any weight. So I don't know.

I think my DANGEROUS was the result of the quick change. I have no explanation for the 'perfectly fine'.

Profile

Eli

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23 45 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 01:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios